The Concept Of Human Creation According To Islamic Scholars As A Criticism Of Homo Economicus

Authors

  • Khairul Umam University of Darussalam Gontor
  • Akbar Yazidurrahma University of Darussalam Gontor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51498/putih.v9i1.139

Keywords:

Human, worldview, homo economicus, rationality, al-nafsu

Abstract

Humans who were created with a lot of diversity and abilities and strengths that are more than other living things make them superior in many aspects. But unfortunately, it turns out that this diversity has resulted in the birth of a distorted perspective on world life, especially regarding wealth. Not a few people or individuals judge other humans by the parameters of the assets they have and ignore other aspects of being human. This principle is the root of the world view of Homo Economicus. This study aims to criticize and refute the ideas and perspectives of Homo Economicus on human essence through the ideas of Muslim scholars about human nature. This research is a conceptual review of the literature using a normative descriptive method. The results of the study show that the emergence of Homo Economicus is caused because they adhere to the principle that views life only based on rationality and reason, whereas according to Islam this is not sufficient to be relied upon as the basis for the absolute truth of knowledge, because humans are entities that are manifested from the combination of body and spirit. , the second is what represents reason and al-nafsu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ghazâlî. Ihyâ‘ ‘Ulûm Al-Dîn. Vol. VIII. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1980.

Al-Ghazâlî. Kiymiya’ Al-Sa’adat. Edited by Najah Iwad. Kairo: Dar al-Muqatham, 2010.

———. Ma‘arij Al-Quds Fî Madârij Ma‘rifat Al-Nafs. Kairo: al-Jundi, 1968.

———. Mîzân Al-’Amal. Kairo: Dâr al-Ma‘arîf, 1961.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. Tahafut Al-Falasifah. Edited by Sulaiman Dunya. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 2017.

Al-Jawziyah, Ibnu al-Qayim. Al-Ruh. Edited by Muhammad Ajmal. Edisi 3. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 2019.

Al-Razi, Fakhru al-Din. Al-Nafsu Wa Al-Ruh. Edited by Muhammad Al-Ma’sumi. Port Said: Maktabat al-Tsaqfat al-Diniyat, 2009.

Febriliyani, Fitri, Fakultas Ushuluddin, D A N Adab, Universitas Islam Negeri, Sultan Maulana, and Hasanuddin Banten. “PROSES PENCIPTAAN MANUSIA,” 2018.

Maharani, Septiana Dwiputri. “Manusia Sebagai Homo Economicus: Refleksi Atas Kasus-Kasus Kejahatan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Filsafat Vol. 26, no. No. 1 (n.d.).

Miskawaih. Tahdzib Al-Akhlaq. Edited by Imad Al-Hilali. 1st ed. Beirut: Mansyurat Al-jamal, 2011.

Nasution, M. Yasir. “Telaah Signifikansi Konsep Manusia Menurut Al-Ghazâlî.” MIQOT Vol. XXXV, no. No. 2 (n.d.).

Nobel, Lindau, Laureate Meeting, Economic Sciences, Political Economy, Guest Editor, The Growing Failure, Neoclassical Paradigm, Teach Economics, and Critical Approach. “A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 78, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258.

Persky, Joseph. “ Retrospectives: The Ethology of Homo Economicus .” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, no. 2 (1995): 221–31. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.221.

Polanyi, Karl. The Livelihood of Man (Ed. H. W. Pearson). New York: Academic Press., n.d.

Priyono, B Herry. “Homo Economicus,” 2017, 103–29.

Robinson, Joan. Economic Philosophy. London: Penguin, n.d.

Satriadi, Inong. “Tujuan Penciptaan Manusia Dan Nilai Edukasinya (Kajian Tafsir Tematis).” Ta’dib 11, no. 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v12i1.153.

Sen, Amartya. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 6, no. No. 4 (1977): 317–44.

———. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.

Shihab, M. Qurauisy. Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28 — Updated on 2024-08-08

Versions

How to Cite

Umam, K., & Yazidurrahma, A. (2024). The Concept Of Human Creation According To Islamic Scholars As A Criticism Of Homo Economicus. PUTIH: Jurnal Pengetahuan Tentang Ilmu Dan Hikmah, 9(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.51498/putih.v9i1.139 (Original work published March 28, 2024)